Why are schools lowering standards to improve racial equity?

Schools are lowering standards to improve racial equity as a strategy to address systemic disparities in academic achievement and opportunity, often by eliminating tracked or honors classes and revising grading policies to reduce gaps between racial and socioeconomic groups.

Background on Racial Equity in Education

The push to lower academic standards or restructure educational systems often stems from a recognition of persistent achievement gaps, where students of color and those from lower-income backgrounds are disproportionately placed in lower-track classes or receive lower grades due to systemic barriers. In California, for instance, several school districts including Culver City, Santa Monica-Malibu, and San Diego Unified have eliminated honors English classes for freshman and sophomore students, adopting an 'Honors for All' approach to create a single, rigorous curriculum intended to serve all students equally. This shift, as reported, aims to bridge the achievement gap by ensuring that underrepresented students have access to challenging coursework previously reserved for a select few[1]. Similarly, the San Francisco Public Schools’ "Grading for Equity" initiative plans to adjust grading scales so that students can pass with scores as low as 41 percent and removes penalties for behavior-related issues like late work or attendance, arguing that traditional grading reinforces socioeconomic disparities[3].

Public Discourse and Controversy

The public discourse surrounding these changes is deeply polarized. Supporters argue that such reforms are necessary to dismantle structural inequities in education. Educators like Nathan Fulcher from Santa Monica High School emphasize that de-tracking classes better reflects the diversity of the student body and taps into the strength of varied perspectives in the classroom[1]. Educational consultant Joe Feldman, involved in San Francisco’s initiative, contends that traditional grading practices perpetuate opportunity gaps for vulnerable students, advocating for assessments focused on mastery rather than behavior[3]. Data from Sequoia Union High School District supports this view, showing an increase in high-performing students and participation in advanced courses after de-tracking ninth-grade honors classes[1].

Critics, however, express significant concern that these policies undermine academic rigor and disadvantage high-achieving students. Parents in California districts have voiced fears that a one-size-fits-all curriculum deprives their children of challenges needed for competitive university admissions, with some, like Lori Burke Ellet from San Diego, decrying the perceived theft of opportunity under the guise of equity[1]. In Troy, Michigan, opposition to detracking math classes led to a petition with over 3,000 signatures and heated school board meetings, reflecting broader parental pushback against perceived lowering of standards[2]. Critics of San Francisco’s grading policy, including educators like Laurie Sargent, argue that awarding passing grades for minimal effort does not prepare students for college or the workforce, where such leniency does not exist[3]. Additionally, Holly MathNerd’s critique of progressive educator Jo Boaler’s approach highlights a concern that reforms prioritizing equity often impose methods that may disadvantage certain groups, particularly boys, by enforcing collectivist teaching styles over traditional, individualized learning[4].

Implementation Challenges and Varied Outcomes

The implementation of these equity-driven reforms has met with mixed results and significant challenges. In some districts like Evanston Township High School in Illinois and South Side Middle School on Long Island, slow rollouts of detracking over years allowed for adjustments and data collection, showing improved outcomes such as higher rates of students earning advanced diplomas without evident harm to high-achievers[2]. Conversely, rapid changes, as seen in Shaker Heights, Ohio, faced criticism from teachers for insufficient training and from parents for lack of preparation, suggesting that pace and community engagement are critical to success[2]. San Francisco’s initiative also drew backlash for a lack of transparency, as the policy was not subject to a public vote, leaving parents and even some school board members feeling excluded from the process[3].

Broader Context and Conflicting Views

The debate over lowering standards for racial equity ties into larger national conversations about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in education, especially post-2024 election rhetoric questioning such initiatives. While some districts persist with reforms despite political shifts, others, like San Francisco, have faced significant backlash leading to policy reversals, as noted in the cancellation of the "Grading for Equity" initiative after public outcry[3]. Conflicting views persist between those who see these changes as essential for leveling the playing field and those who believe they compromise educational quality and fairness to high-performing students.

Sources

[1] High schools across California eliminate honors classes in favor of an ‘Honors For All’ approach - https://highschool.latimes.com/education/high-schools-ca-eliminate-honors-classes/ (Supports equity-driven reforms by highlighting increased access to rigorous coursework and improved outcomes for underrepresented students.)
[2] Eliminating advanced math 'tracks' often prompts outrage. Some districts buck the trend - https://hechingerreport.org/eliminating-advanced-math-often-prompts-outrage-some-districts-buck-the-trend/ (Presents a balanced view, detailing both successful slow detracking efforts and significant parental opposition to rapid changes.)
[3] San Francisco Public Schools Convert F's to C's, B's to A's in Equity Push - https://www.newsweek.com/san-francisco-public-schools-equity-homework-2078003 (Critiques equity grading policies as lowering standards, while noting supporter arguments for focusing on mastery over behavior; notes policy cancellation due to backlash.)
[4] Feminizing the Formulas - https://hollymathnerd.substack.com/p/feminizing-the-formulas (Critically views progressive education reforms as potentially disadvantaging certain groups, particularly boys, under equity-focused approaches.)

Suggested Sources[edit]